↓ Skip to main content

Lead heavy metal toxicity induced changes on growth and antioxidative enzymes level in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 119)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lead heavy metal toxicity induced changes on growth and antioxidative enzymes level in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]
Published in
Botanical Studies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40529-014-0054-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srinivasan Malar, Sahi Shivendra Vikram, Paulo JC Favas, Venkatachalam Perumal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 32%
Environmental Science 28 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Engineering 7 5%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 34 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,785,024
of 14,006,078 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#40
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,283
of 258,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,006,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them