You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Alison L. Greggor, Daniel T. Blumstein, Bob B. M. Wong, Oded Berger-Tal
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||32||53%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||7%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||17||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||14||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||37||39%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||2||2%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 357,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.