↓ Skip to main content

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 186)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0164-4
Authors

Alison L. Greggor, Daniel T. Blumstein, Bob B. M. Wong, Oded Berger-Tal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 40%
Unspecified 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 60%
Unspecified 3 20%
Environmental Science 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#445,570
of 13,536,695 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#15
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,550
of 252,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them