You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0164-4 |
Authors |
Alison L. Greggor, Daniel T. Blumstein, Bob B. M. Wong, Oded Berger-Tal |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 17% |
Germany | 5 | 8% |
Australia | 5 | 8% |
Canada | 4 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Norway | 2 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 53% |
Scientists | 23 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,033,403
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#33
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,672
of 357,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.