| Title |
Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0164-4 |
| Authors |
Alison L. Greggor, Daniel T. Blumstein, Bob B. M. Wong, Oded Berger-Tal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 17% |
| Australia | 7 | 12% |
| Germany | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 52% |
| Scientists | 25 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,073,799
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#33
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,015
of 359,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.