↓ Skip to main content

Comments on a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinicopathological significance of CDH1 in gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comments on a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinicopathological significance of CDH1 in gastric cancer
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s103922
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianping Zhou, Chao Tu, Lianwen Yuan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,003,901
of 7,401,456 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#68
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,584
of 297,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#9
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,401,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.