You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The validity of synthetic clinical data: a validation study of a leading synthetic data generator (Synthea) using clinical quality measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0793-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junqiao Chen, David Chun, Milesh Patel, Epson Chiang, Jesse James |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 32 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,997,785
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#242
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,900
of 351,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.