You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comment on “Global pattern of nest predation is disrupted by climate change in shorebirds”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaw8529 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Bulla, Jeroen Reneerkens, Emily L Weiser, Aleksandr Sokolov, Audrey R Taylor, Benoît Sittler, Brian J McCaffery, Dan R Ruthrauff, Daniel H Catlin, David C Payer, David H Ward, Diana V Solovyeva, Eduardo S A Santos, Eldar Rakhimberdiev, Erica Nol, Eunbi Kwon, Glen S Brown, Glenda D Hevia, H River Gates, James A Johnson, Jan A van Gils, Jannik Hansen, Jean-François Lamarre, Jennie Rausch, Jesse R Conklin, Joe Liebezeit, Joël Bêty, Johannes Lang, José A Alves, Juan Fernández-Elipe, Klaus-Michael Exo, Loïc Bollache, Marcelo Bertellotti, Marie-Andrée Giroux, Martijn van de Pol, Matthew Johnson, Megan L Boldenow, Mihai Valcu, Mikhail Soloviev, Natalya Sokolova, Nathan R Senner, Nicolas Lecomte, Nicolas Meyer, Niels Martin Schmidt, Olivier Gilg, Paul A Smith, Paula Machín, Rebecca L McGuire, Ricardo A S Cerboncini, Richard Ottvall, Rob S A van Bemmelen, Rose J Swift, Sarah T Saalfeld, Sarah E Jamieson, Stephen Brown, Theunis Piersma, Tomas Albrecht, Verónica D'Amico, Richard B Lanctot, Bart Kempenaers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 22% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 71% |
| Scientists | 11 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#665,531
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science
#14,527
of 83,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,300
of 369,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#279
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.