↓ Skip to main content

Variable retention in Tasmania, Australia: trends over 16 years of monitoring and adaptive management

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variable retention in Tasmania, Australia: trends over 16 years of monitoring and adaptive management
Published in
Ecological Processes, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0174-8
Authors

Robyn E. Scott, Mark G. Neyland, Susan C. Baker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,303,101
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#95
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,350
of 356,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.