↓ Skip to main content

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna A. Damen, Romin Pajouheshnia, Pauline Heus, Karel G. M. Moons, Johannes B. Reitsma, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Lotty Hooft, Thomas P. A. Debray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 69 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,851,758
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,764
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,763
of 359,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#36
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.