↓ Skip to main content

A survey of Sub-Saharan African medical schools

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of Sub-Saharan African medical schools
Published in
Human Resources for Health, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-10-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candice Chen, Eric Buch, Travis Wassermann, Seble Frehywot, Fitzhugh Mullan, Francis Omaswa, S Ryan Greysen, Joseph C Kolars, Delanyo Dovlo, Diaa Eldin El Gali Abu Bakr, Abraham Haileamlak, Abdel Karim Koumare, Emiola Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa suffers a disproportionate share of the world's burden of disease while having some of the world's greatest health care workforce shortages. Doctors are an important component of any high functioning health care system. However, efforts to strengthen the doctor workforce in the region have been limited by a small number of medical schools with limited enrolments, international migration of graduates, poor geographic distribution of doctors, and insufficient data on medical schools. The goal of the Sub-Saharan African Medical Schools Study (SAMSS) is to increase the level of understanding and expand the baseline data on medical schools in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 46 27%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 38%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#1,284,260
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#102
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,496
of 168,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them