↓ Skip to main content

Tomato lycopene and its role in human health and chronic diseases.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
487 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tomato lycopene and its role in human health and chronic diseases.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2000
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Agarwal, A V Rao

Abstract

Lycopene is a carotenoid that is present in tomatoes, processed tomato products and other fruits. It is one of the most potent antioxidants among dietary carotenoids. Dietary intake of tomatoes and tomato products containing lycopene has been shown to be associated with a decreased risk of chronic diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. Serum and tissue lycopene levels have been found to be inversely related to the incidence of several types of cancer, including breast cancer and prostate cancer. Although the antioxidant properties of lycopene are thought to be primarily responsible for its beneficial effects, evidence is accumulating to suggest that other mechanisms may also be involved. In this article we outline the possible mechanisms of action of lycopene and review the current understanding of its role in human health and disease prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 621 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 119 19%
Student > Bachelor 106 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 12%
Researcher 49 8%
Student > Postgraduate 43 7%
Other 105 17%
Unknown 134 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 184 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 8%
Chemistry 39 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 3%
Other 95 15%
Unknown 145 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 557. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#44,394
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#76
of 9,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 38,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.