↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Cutaneous Evaporative Water Loss in Frogs Demonstrates Correlation with Ecological Habits

Overview of attention for article published in Physiological & Biochemical Zoology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Analysis of Cutaneous Evaporative Water Loss in Frogs Demonstrates Correlation with Ecological Habits
Published in
Physiological & Biochemical Zoology, September 2005
DOI 10.1086/432152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanne E. Young, Keith A. Christian, Stephen Donnellan, Christopher R. Tracy, David Parry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 4%
United States 5 3%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 141 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 70%
Environmental Science 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#9,594,562
of 15,083,333 outputs
Outputs from Physiological & Biochemical Zoology
#265
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,006
of 309,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological & Biochemical Zoology
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,083,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.