You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential Effects of Oral Boluses of Vitamin D2 vs Vitamin D3 on Vitamin D Metabolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JCEM, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1210/jc.2019-00207 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adrian R Martineau, Kenneth E Thummel, Zhican Wang, David A Jolliffe, Barbara J Boucher, Simon J Griffin, Nita G Forouhi, Graham A Hitman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 31% |
Brazil | 2 | 15% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 22% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#993,330
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#769
of 15,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,924
of 368,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#12
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.