↓ Skip to main content

Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006173.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hora Soltani, David R Hutchon, Thomas A Poulose

Abstract

Administration of the uterotonic drugs is one of the main components of the active management of the third stage of labour. The timing of uterotonics varies considerably across the globe and it may have significant implications on the well-being of the mothers and their babies.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Unspecified 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,335,354
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,918
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,241
of 109,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.