↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000031.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman, Lynne Cresswell, Michaela Blundell, Carrol L Gamble, Paula R Williamson

Abstract

Publication of complete trial results is essential if people are to be able to make well-informed decisions about health care. Selective reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a common problem.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Design 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#424,161
of 12,350,579 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,145
of 8,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,130
of 115,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,350,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.