You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient involvement in questionnaire design: tackling response error and burden
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-019-0175-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marissa Ayano Mes, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Vari Wileman, Caroline Brigitte Katzer, Melissa Goodbourn, Steven Towndrow, Stephanie Jane Caroline Taylor, Rob Horne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 4 | 11% |
Psychology | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,204,154
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#267
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,055
of 371,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.