You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011695.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie M Goudet, Barry A Bogin, Nyovani J Madise, Paula L Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1352 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 151 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 126 | 9% |
| Researcher | 93 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 86 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 6% |
| Other | 229 | 17% |
| Unknown | 585 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 203 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 188 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 65 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 47 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 3% |
| Other | 198 | 15% |
| Unknown | 617 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#746,233
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,393
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,192
of 367,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.