↓ Skip to main content

Weaponizing vulnerability to climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weaponizing vulnerability to climate change
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101928
Authors

Kimberley Anh Thomas, Benjamin P. Warner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#674,507
of 13,177,596 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#249
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,168
of 151,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,177,596 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.