↓ Skip to main content

Best practice management guidelines for fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome: a consensus statement from the FD/MAS international consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practice management guidelines for fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome: a consensus statement from the FD/MAS international consortium
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13023-019-1102-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Alison Boyce, Natasha Appelman-Dijkstra, Juling Ong, Patrizia Defabianis, Amaka Offiah, Paul Arundel, Nick Shaw, Valter Dal Pos, Ann Underhil, Deanna Portero, Lisa Heral, Anne-Marie Heegaard, Laura Masi, Fergal Monsell, Robert Stanton, Pieter Durk Sander Dijkstra, Maria Luisa Brandi, Roland Chapurlat, Neveen Agnes Therese Hamdy, Michael Terrence Collins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Other 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 82 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 88 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,202,589
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#255
of 3,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,140
of 369,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#7
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.