↓ Skip to main content

Geology of the Hokusai quadrangle (H05), Mercury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Maps, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 225)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters
Title
Geology of the Hokusai quadrangle (H05), Mercury
Published in
Journal of Maps, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/17445647.2019.1625821
Authors

Jack Wright, David A. Rothery, Matthew R. Balme, Susan J. Conway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#589,996
of 13,235,895 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Maps
#13
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,158
of 181,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Maps
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,235,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.