↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliette N Malley, Ann-Marie Towers, Ann P Netten, John E Brazier, Julien E Forder, Terry Flynn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 7%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 63 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,129,995
of 23,607,611 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#714
of 2,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,688
of 252,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#11
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,607,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.