↓ Skip to main content

Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia O'Cathain, Emma Knowles, Jon Nicholl

Abstract

To address three methodological challenges when attempting to measure patients' experiences and views of a system of inter-related health services rather than a single service: the feasibility of a population survey for identifying system users, the optimal recall period for system use, and the mode of administration which is most feasible and representative in the context of routine measurement of system performance. Postal survey of a random sample of 900 members of the general population and market research telephone survey of quota sample of 1000 members of the general population. Response rates to the postal and market research telephone population surveys were 51% (457 out of 893 receiving the questionnaire) and 9% (1014 out of 11924 contactable telephone numbers) respectively. Both surveys were able to identify users of the system in the previous three months: 22% (99/457) of postal and 15% (151/1000) of telephone survey respondents. For both surveys, recall of event occurrence reduced by a half after four weeks. The telephone survey more accurately estimated use of individual services within the system than the postal survey. Experiences and views of events remained reasonably stable over the three month recall time period for both modes of administration. Even though the response rate was lower, the telephone survey was more representative of the population, was faster and cheaper to undertake, and had fewer missing values. It is possible to identify users of a health care system using a population survey. A recall period of three months can be used to estimate experiences and views but one month is more accurate for estimating use of the system. A quota sample market research telephone survey gives a low response rate yet is more representative and accurate than a postal survey of a random sample of the population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 30%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 35%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 26%