You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1310-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Genevieve L. Wojcik, Mariaelisa Graff, Katherine K. Nishimura, Ran Tao, Jeffrey Haessler, Christopher R. Gignoux, Heather M. Highland, Yesha M. Patel, Elena P. Sorokin, Christy L. Avery, Gillian M. Belbin, Stephanie A. Bien, Iona Cheng, Sinead Cullina, Chani J. Hodonsky, Yao Hu, Laura M. Huckins, Janina Jeff, Anne E. Justice, Jonathan M. Kocarnik, Unhee Lim, Bridget M. Lin, Yingchang Lu, Sarah C. Nelson, Sung-Shim L. Park, Hannah Poisner, Michael H. Preuss, Melissa A. Richard, Claudia Schurmann, Veronica W. Setiawan, Alexandra Sockell, Karan Vahi, Marie Verbanck, Abhishek Vishnu, Ryan W. Walker, Kristin L. Young, Niha Zubair, Victor Acuña-Alonso, Jose Luis Ambite, Kathleen C. Barnes, Eric Boerwinkle, Erwin P. Bottinger, Carlos D. Bustamante, Christian Caberto, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Matthew P. Conomos, Ewa Deelman, Ron Do, Kimberly Doheny, Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes, Myriam Fornage, Benyam Hailu, Gerardo Heiss, Brenna M. Henn, Lucia A. Hindorff, Rebecca D. Jackson, Cecelia A. Laurie, Cathy C. Laurie, Yuqing Li, Dan-Yu Lin, Andres Moreno-Estrada, Girish Nadkarni, Paul J. Norman, Loreall C. Pooler, Alexander P. Reiner, Jane Romm, Chiara Sabatti, Karla Sandoval, Xin Sheng, Eli A. Stahl, Daniel O. Stram, Timothy A. Thornton, Christina L. Wassel, Lynne R. Wilkens, Cheryl A. Winkler, Sachi Yoneyama, Steven Buyske, Christopher A. Haiman, Charles Kooperberg, Loic Le Marchand, Ruth J. F. Loos, Tara C. Matise, Kari E. North, Ulrike Peters, Eimear E. Kenny, Christopher S. Carlson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 691 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 250 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 48 | 7% |
| Canada | 24 | 3% |
| Spain | 16 | 2% |
| Australia | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 10 | 1% |
| France | 8 | 1% |
| Mexico | 8 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 89 | 13% |
| Unknown | 217 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 329 | 48% |
| Scientists | 328 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 790 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 790 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 150 | 19% |
| Researcher | 136 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 16% |
| Unknown | 211 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 226 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 105 | 13% |
| Unknown | 247 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 558. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#43,886
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,739
of 98,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#826
of 368,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#81
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.