You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of anthropogenic light on bird movement, habitat selection, and distribution: a systematic map protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0155-5 |
Authors |
Carrie Ann Adams, Arden Blumenthal, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Erin Bayne, Colleen Cassady St. Clair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Israel | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
Scientists | 8 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 33 | 24% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,321,084
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#99
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,171
of 354,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.