↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the hand

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the hand
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004377
Authors

Lucie Brosseau, KA Yonge, Vivian Welch, S Marchand, Maria Judd, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 19%
Engineering 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,306,326
of 14,222,292 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,285
of 10,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,545
of 256,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,222,292 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.