↓ Skip to main content

Control group changes in objectively measured physical activity in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control group changes in objectively measured physical activity in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1060-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Freene, Rachel Davey, Steven M. McPhail

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 25 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,367,404
of 24,145,400 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,493
of 2,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,224
of 355,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,145,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.