You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New method for postoperative pain relief using a combination of noxious and non-noxious stimuli after impacted wisdom tooth extraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Oral Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2334/josnusd.18-0187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keiko Fujii-Abe, Masahiro Umino, Hiroshi Kawahara, Chika Terada, Kazuhito Satomura, Haruhisa Fukayama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Philippines | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,452,040
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Science
#116
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,963
of 438,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.