↓ Skip to main content

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 246)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8
Authors

Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 70 31%
Social Sciences 42 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 54 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2021.
All research outputs
#292,253
of 18,964,669 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,946
of 274,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,964,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them