Report for: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Title	Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
Published in	Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI	10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8
Authors	Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Canada	5	12%
United States	5	12%
United Kingdom	4	10%
South Africa	2	5%
France	2	5%
Australia	2	5%
Germany	1	2%
Kenya	1	2%
Zambia	1	2%
Other	6	14%
Unknown	13	31%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	29	69%
Scientists	11	26%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	2	5%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Nepal	1	<1%
Portugal	1	<1%
Unknown	290	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	60	21%
Researcher	53	18%
Student > Master	42	14%
Student > Postgraduate	19	7%
Other	16	5%
Other	49	17%
Unknown	53	18%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Environmental Science	80	27%
Social Sciences	46	16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	35	12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance	12	4%
Arts and Humanities	12	4%
Other	28	10%
Unknown	79	27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.

All research outputs

#286,427

of 23,758,334 outputs

Outputs from Environmental Evidence

of 308 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#5,519

of 301,206 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence

of 6 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,758,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context