↓ Skip to main content

Assistive technology for rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assistive technology for rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006729.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Tuntland, Ingvild Kjeken, Lena V. Nordheim, Louise Falzon, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Psychology 12 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,768,298
of 14,550,524 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,679
of 11,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,941
of 258,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,550,524 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.