↓ Skip to main content

Impact of hospital nephrectomy volume on intermediate- to long-term survival in renal cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Urology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of hospital nephrectomy volume on intermediate- to long-term survival in renal cell carcinoma
Published in
British Journal of Urology, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/bju.14848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray C. J. Hsu, Matthew Barclay, Molly A. Loughran, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, James N. Armitage

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,250,877
of 13,735,692 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Urology
#945
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,430
of 251,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Urology
#32
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,735,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.