↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of mathematical models for testing antifungal activity of different essential oils against Candida species

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Oral Biology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of mathematical models for testing antifungal activity of different essential oils against Candida species
Published in
Archives of Oral Biology, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.11.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjana Perić, Katarina Rajković, Aleksandra Milić Lemić, Rade Živković, Valentina Arsić Arsenijević

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,684,243
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Oral Biology
#1,219
of 1,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,665
of 438,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Oral Biology
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.