You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infective endocarditis: innovations in the management of an old disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cardiology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41569-019-0215-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernard Iung, Xavier Duval |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,617,608
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#476
of 1,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,699
of 356,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.