↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral and neural correlates of emotional development: typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral and neural correlates of emotional development: typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana A. Porto, Magda L. Nunes, Charles A. Nelson

Abstract

To describe the main findings of studies of behavioral and neural correlates regarding the development of facial emotion processing during the first year of life in typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers. Comprehensive, non-systematic review of the literature on studies about individual differences in facial emotion processing by newborns and infants over the first year of life. Maternal stress related to depression and anxiety has been associated to atypical emotional processing and attentional behaviors in the offspring. Recent neurophysiological studies using electroencephalogram and event-related potentials have begun to shed light on the possible mechanisms underlying such behaviors. Infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers have increased risk for several adverse outcomes across the lifespan. Further neurobehavioral investigations and the promotion of clinical and developmental research integration might eventually contribute to refining screening tools, improving treatment, and enabling primary prevention interventions for children at risk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Unspecified 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 29 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,747,075
of 20,520,938 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#125
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,227
of 278,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,520,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.