Title |
Pure Iterative Reconstruction Improves Image Quality in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis Acquired at Substantially Reduced Radiation Doses in Patients With Active Crohn Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1097/rct.0000000000000358 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick D. McLaughlin, Kevin P. Murphy, Maria Twomey, Siobhan B. O'Neill, Fiachra Moloney, Owen J. O'Connor, Kevin O'Regan, Sean McSweeney, Anne Marie McGarrigle, Niamh Moore, Jackie Bye, Fergus Shanahan, Michael M. Maher |
Abstract |
We assessed diagnostic accuracy and image quality of modified protocol (MP) computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis reconstructed using pure iterative reconstruction (IR) in patients with Crohn disease (CD). Thirty-four consecutive patients with CD were referred with suspected extramural complications. Two contemporaneous CT datasets were acquired in all patients: standard protocol (SP) and MP. The MP and SP protocols were designed to impart radiation exposures of 10% to 20% and 80% to 90% of routine abdominopelvic CT, respectively. The MP images were reconstructed with model-based IR (MBIR) and adaptive statistical IR (ASIR). The MP-CT and SP-CT dose length product were 88 (58) mGy.cm (1.27 [0.87] mSv) and 303 [204] mGy.cm (4.8 [2.99] mSv), respectively (P < 0.001). Median diagnostic acceptability, spatial resolution, and contrast resolution were significantly higher and subjective noise scores were significantly lower on SP-ASIR 40 compared with all MP datasets. There was perfect clinical agreement between MP-MBIR and SP-ASIR 40 images for detection of extramural complications. Modified protocol CT using pure IR is feasible for assessment of active CD. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 13% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |