↓ Skip to main content

Incorporating Patient Preferences in Noninferiority Trials

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
206 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Incorporating Patient Preferences in Noninferiority Trials
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.7059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio A. Acuna, Tyler R. Chesney, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 206 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#197,539
of 16,630,619 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,156
of 28,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,281
of 267,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#114
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,630,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.