↓ Skip to main content

Negative impacts of summer heat on Sierra Nevada tree seedlings

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative impacts of summer heat on Sierra Nevada tree seedlings
Published in
Ecosphere, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2776
Authors

Emily V. Moran, Adrian J. Das, Jon E. Keeley, Nathan L. Stephenson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 60%
Unspecified 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,517,674
of 13,352,827 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#1,214
of 1,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,194
of 224,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#50
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,352,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.