You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurobiological and clinical effect of metacognitive interpersonal therapy vs structured clinical model: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-019-2127-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Rosa Magni, Antonino Carcione, Clarissa Ferrari, Antonio Semerari, Ilaria Riccardi, Giuseppe Nicolo’, Mariangela Lanfredi, Laura Pedrini, Maria Cotelli, Luisella Bocchio, Michela Pievani, Roberto Gasparotti, Roberta Rossi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,166,847
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,018
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,352
of 351,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#43
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.