↓ Skip to main content

The effects of food level and conspecific density on biting and cannibalism in larval long-toed salamanders, Ambystoma macrodactylum

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of food level and conspecific density on biting and cannibalism in larval long-toed salamanders, Ambystoma macrodactylum
Published in
Oecologia, July 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004420100641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica L. Wildy, Douglas P. Chivers, Joseph M. Kiesecker, Andrew R. Blaustein

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 69 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 29%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 75%
Environmental Science 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unknown 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,820,641
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#398
of 3,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,236
of 262,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.