↓ Skip to main content

A Technical, Economic and Environmental Comparison of Composting and Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Municipal Waste

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Technical, Economic and Environmental Comparison of Composting and Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Municipal Waste
Published in
Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, June 2006
DOI 10.1080/10934520600614488
Pubmed ID
Authors

JERRY D. MURPHY, NIAMH M. POWER

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Master 25 21%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 28%
Engineering 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Energy 7 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 30 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,185,191
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#356
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,575
of 262,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.