You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fluid management and risk factors for renal dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Muller, Samir Jaber, Nicolas Molinari, Laurent Favier, Jérôme Larché, Gilles Motte, Sonia Lazarovici, Luc Jacques, Sandrine Alonso, Marc Leone, Jean Michel Constantin, Bernard Allaouchiche, Carey Suehs, Jean-Yves Lefrant, the AzuRéa Group |
| Abstract |
The causative role of new hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) in renal dysfunction frequency (a > 50% increase in serum creatinine or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT)) remains debated. Using the database of a multicenter study focusing on patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, the present study aimed at identifying factors associated with the occurrence of renal dysfunction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 34% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 77% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2012.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,211
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,643
of 167,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#60
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.