↓ Skip to main content

One hypervirulent clone, sequence type 283, accounts for a large proportion of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from humans and diseased tilapia in Southeast Asia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One hypervirulent clone, sequence type 283, accounts for a large proportion of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from humans and diseased tilapia in Southeast Asia
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Barkham, Ruth N. Zadoks, Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai, Stephen Baker, Vu Thi Ngoc Bich, Victoria Chalker, Man Ling Chau, David Dance, Rama Narayana Deepak, H. Rogier van Doorn, Ramona A. Gutierrez, Mark A. Holmes, Lan Nguyen Phu Huong, Tse Hsien Koh, Elisabete Martins, Kurosh Mehershahi, Paul Newton, Lee Ching Ng, Nguyen Ngoc Phuoc, Ornuma Sangwichian, Pongpun Sawatwong, Uraiwan Surin, Thean Yen Tan, Wen Ying Tang, Nguyen Vu Thuy, Paul Turner, Manivanh Vongsouvath, Defeng Zhang, Toni Whistler, Swaine L. Chen

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 53 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#836,695
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#509
of 8,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,665
of 351,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#10
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.