↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing for aesthetically pleasing quadrotor camera motion

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing for aesthetically pleasing quadrotor camera motion
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, August 2018
DOI 10.1145/3197517.3201390
Authors

Christoph Gebhardt, Stefan Stevšić, Otmar Hilliges

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 56%
Engineering 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,199,245
of 15,348,605 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,889
of 1,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,558
of 262,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,348,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.