You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Choice of contraceptive methods in public and private facilities in rural India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4249-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arupendra Mozumdar, Vandana Gautam, Abhishek Gautam, Arnab Dey, Uttamacharya, Ruhi Saith, Pranita Achyut, Abhishek Kumar, Kumudha Aruldas, Amit Chakraverty, Dinesh Agarwal, Ravi Verma, Priya Nanda, Suneeta Krishnan, Niranjan Saggurti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 7 | 58% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,312,150
of 23,940,484 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,494
of 8,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,034
of 353,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#21
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.