You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modelling cost-effectiveness of tenofovir for prevention of mother to child transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in South Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7095-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jolynne Mokaya, Edward A. O. Burn, Cynthia Raissa Tamandjou, Dominique Goedhals, Eleanor J. Barnes, Monique Andersson, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Philippa C. Matthews |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 11 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 52 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,823,737
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,807
of 15,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,749
of 351,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#166
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.