↓ Skip to main content

Extremes of heat, drought and precipitation depress reproductive performance in shortgrass prairie passerines

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extremes of heat, drought and precipitation depress reproductive performance in shortgrass prairie passerines
Published in
Ibis, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/ibi.12373
Authors

Reesa Y. Conrey, Susan K. Skagen, Amy A. Yackel Adams, Arvind O. Panjabi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 55%
Environmental Science 21 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,022,184
of 17,911,762 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#942
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,498
of 272,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,911,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.