↓ Skip to main content

Structural Equation Modeling for Observational Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Equation Modeling for Observational Studies
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2008
DOI 10.2193/2007-307
Authors

James B. Grace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 16 3%
United States 9 2%
Canada 5 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Peru 2 <1%
Other 16 3%
Unknown 487 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 23%
Researcher 117 21%
Student > Master 94 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 8%
Student > Bachelor 34 6%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 44 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 283 51%
Environmental Science 135 25%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 2%
Other 32 6%
Unknown 70 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,073,792
of 16,056,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#484
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,288
of 125,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,056,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.