You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine for asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001112.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J Welsh, Anna Bara, Elizabeth Barley, Christopher J Cates |
| Abstract |
Caffeine has a variety of pharmacological effects; it is a weak bronchodilator and it also reduces respiratory muscle fatigue. It is chemically related to the drug theophylline which is used to treat asthma. It has been suggested that caffeine may reduce asthma symptoms and interest has been expressed in its potential role as an asthma treatment. A number of studies have explored the effects of caffeine in asthma, this is the first review to systematically examine and summarise the evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 365 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 12% |
| Japan | 27 | 7% |
| Nigeria | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 194 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 318 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 8% |
| Scientists | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Researcher | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 99 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 104 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#80,393
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203
of 174,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.