↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance: a systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Parmelli, Gerd Flodgren, Fiona Beyer, Nick Baillie, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Martin P Eccles

Abstract

Organisational culture is an anthropological metaphor used to inform research and consultancy and to explain organisational environments. In recent years, increasing emphasis has been placed on the need to change organisational culture in order to improve healthcare performance. However, the precise function of organisational culture in healthcare policy often remains underspecified and the desirability and feasibility of strategies to be adopted have been called into question. The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture in order to improve healthcare performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 545 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 154 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 12%
Researcher 59 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Student > Bachelor 36 6%
Other 119 21%
Unknown 100 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 83 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 14%
Social Sciences 61 11%
Psychology 47 8%
Other 66 12%
Unknown 112 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,290,340
of 25,354,251 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#221
of 1,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,823
of 115,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,354,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.