↓ Skip to main content

The role of chemical amendments on modulating ammonia loss and quality parameters of co-composts from waste cocoa pods

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of chemical amendments on modulating ammonia loss and quality parameters of co-composts from waste cocoa pods
Published in
International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40093-019-0285-3
Authors

Rokotamana Vitinaqailevu, B. K. Rajashekhar Rao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,349,973
of 13,322,622 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture
#7
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,332
of 202,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,322,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them