You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On the potential of in vitro organ-chip models to define temporal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-45656-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher W. McAleer, Amy Pointon, Christopher J. Long, Rocky L. Brighton, Benjamin D. Wilkin, L. Richard Bridges, Narasimham Narasimhan Sriram, Kristin Fabre, Robin McDougall, Victorine P. Muse, Jerome T. Mettetal, Abhishek Srivastava, Dominic Williams, Mark T. Schnepper, Jeff L. Roles, Michael L. Shuler, James J. Hickman, Lorna Ewart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
India | 2 | 11% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Norway | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 25% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 25 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#686,680
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,476
of 141,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,591
of 363,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#185
of 3,329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.